Nu weet ik niet zeker of het wel de moeite waard is, en gewoon aan Firefox moet wennen. Ik lees het volgende argument om twee browsers te hebben:
" Despite (or maybe because of) constant "upgrades" allegedly designed to "protect" my online security, I find myself having to run two browsers in order to access Web sites that I never had problems accessing before. Passwords and forms that don't work on Chrome mysteriously work on Firefox, and vice versa. " (2013)
Klopt dit nog steeds in 2017?
Klop